<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox brand stronger than Netscape ever was</title>
	<atom:link href="http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/</link>
	<description>David Tenser's resurrected blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Memoria de Acceso Aleatorio &#187; Requiem por un motor de visualizaciÃ³n web</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-19025</link>
		<dc:creator>Memoria de Acceso Aleatorio &#187; Requiem por un motor de visualizaciÃ³n web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-19025</guid>
		<description>[...] Mientras el resto de la web est&#225; haciendo notar la ignominiosa y definitiva muerte del navegador que se hizo con uno de los m&#225;s importantes nombres de la Internet de antes de la guerra, yo quisiera lamentar la muerte de algo diferente, la de un motor de visualizaci&#243;n web notorio aunque nunca demasiado sonado. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mientras el resto de la web est&#225; haciendo notar la ignominiosa y definitiva muerte del navegador que se hizo con uno de los m&#225;s importantes nombres de la Internet de antes de la guerra, yo quisiera lamentar la muerte de algo diferente, la de un motor de visualizaci&#243;n web notorio aunque nunca demasiado sonado. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herr_chagall</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18557</link>
		<dc:creator>herr_chagall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18557</guid>
		<description>there were even people who started going online with windows 3.1 -&#62; ncsa mosaic, anyone?

picking up the torch, netscape was the web browser application that really pushed the web, so personally, it will always remain my #1, if for nostalgic reasons only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there were even people who started going online with windows 3.1 -&gt; ncsa mosaic, anyone?</p>
<p>picking up the torch, netscape was the web browser application that really pushed the web, so personally, it will always remain my #1, if for nostalgic reasons only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ø§ÙÙƒØ§Ø± Ùˆ Ø§Ø­Ù„Ø§Ù… &#187; Requiem for a rendering engine</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18208</link>
		<dc:creator>Ø§ÙÙƒØ§Ø± Ùˆ Ø§Ø­Ù„Ø§Ù… &#187; Requiem for a rendering engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18208</guid>
		<description>[...] While the rest of the web is marking the ignominious final death of the browser bearing one of the greatest names of the pre-War Internet, I want to lament the death of a very different thing, a remarkable yet unheralded rendering engine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While the rest of the web is marking the ignominious final death of the browser bearing one of the greatest names of the pre-War Internet, I want to lament the death of a very different thing, a remarkable yet unheralded rendering engine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RyanVM</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18154</link>
		<dc:creator>RyanVM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18154</guid>
		<description>Might it also be useful to see about having MARs for Netscape --&#62; Firefox (or Seamonkey) upgrades that AOL could offer to existing users? With the exception of profile location, such an upgrade could be largely trivial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might it also be useful to see about having MARs for Netscape &#8211;&gt; Firefox (or Seamonkey) upgrades that AOL could offer to existing users? With the exception of profile location, such an upgrade could be largely trivial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Service Deals</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18151</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Service Deals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18151</guid>
		<description>I wonder how long before the others give up? If they can't all agree on the display of HTML, then I'm afraid to say that the fewer the better. I like the Netscape Add-on idea, use a common base and save web programming waste!

A few of the sites I webmaster have top 10 browser stats that look something like this: Internet Explorer 73%, Firefox 16%, Safari 1%, Netscape 1%, Opera 1%, Others 8%. I would expect other sites to show similar results, post if you have them. I think it's interesting info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how long before the others give up? If they can&#8217;t all agree on the display of HTML, then I&#8217;m afraid to say that the fewer the better. I like the Netscape Add-on idea, use a common base and save web programming waste!</p>
<p>A few of the sites I webmaster have top 10 browser stats that look something like this: Internet Explorer 73%, Firefox 16%, Safari 1%, Netscape 1%, Opera 1%, Others 8%. I would expect other sites to show similar results, post if you have them. I think it&#8217;s interesting info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek StÃ„â„¢pieÃ…â€ž: marcoos &#124; Komputer, Kopmutery, Nootebooki</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18148</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek StÃ„â„¢pieÃ…â€ž: marcoos &#124; Komputer, Kopmutery, Nootebooki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18148</guid>
		<description>[...] Po rozwodzie Netscape.com z Web 2.0 (obecnie portal ten to AOL.com z innym logo, a zrzynka Digga przeniesiona zostaÃ…â€ša na Propeller.com) nastÃ„â€¦piÃ…â€šo jednoczesne wykastrowanie Netscape&#8217;a 9 z wszystkich spoÃ…â€šecznoÃ…â€ºciowych wihajstrÃƒÂ³w, skutkiem czego jedynÃ„â€¦ wartoÃ…â€ºciÃ„â€¦ dodanÃ„â€¦ NN9 wzglÃ„â„¢dem Firefoksa 2 byÃ…â€ša marka Netscape. Przy czym czy to jest &#8220;wartoÃ…â€ºÃ„â€¡ dodana&#8221;? Marka &#8220;Firefox&#8221; jest dziÃ…â€º bardziej rozpoznawalna niÃ…Â¼ &#8220;Netscape&#8221; byÃ…â€ša kiedykolwiek&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Po rozwodzie Netscape.com z Web 2.0 (obecnie portal ten to AOL.com z innym logo, a zrzynka Digga przeniesiona zostaÃ…â€ša na Propeller.com) nastÃ„â€¦piÃ…â€šo jednoczesne wykastrowanie Netscape&#8217;a 9 z wszystkich spoÃ…â€šecznoÃ…â€ºciowych wihajstrÃƒÂ³w, skutkiem czego jedynÃ„â€¦ wartoÃ…â€ºciÃ„â€¦ dodanÃ„â€¦ NN9 wzglÃ„â„¢dem Firefoksa 2 byÃ…â€ša marka Netscape. Przy czym czy to jest &#8220;wartoÃ…â€ºÃ„â€¡ dodana&#8221;? Marka &#8220;Firefox&#8221; jest dziÃ…â€º bardziej rozpoznawalna niÃ…Â¼ &#8220;Netscape&#8221; byÃ…â€ša kiedykolwiek&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek StÃ„â„¢pieÃ…â€ž: marcoos &#124; Komputer, Kopmutery, Nootebooki</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18147</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek StÃ„â„¢pieÃ…â€ž: marcoos &#124; Komputer, Kopmutery, Nootebooki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18147</guid>
		<description>[...] Po rozwodzie Netscape.com z Web 2.0 (obecnie portal ten to AOL.com z innym logo, a zrzynka Digga przeniesiona zostaÃ…â€ša na Propeller.com) nastÃ„â€¦piÃ…â€šo jednoczesne wykastrowanie Netscape&#8217;a 9 z wszystkich spoÃ…â€šecznoÃ…â€ºciowych wihajstrÃƒÂ³w, skutkiem czego jedynÃ„â€¦ wartoÃ…â€ºciÃ„â€¦ dodanÃ„â€¦ NN9 wzglÃ„â„¢dem Firefoksa 2 byÃ…â€ša marka Netscape. Przy czym czy to jest &#8220;wartoÃ…â€ºÃ„â€¡ dodana&#8221;? Marka &#8220;Firefox&#8221; jest dziÃ…â€º bardziej rozpoznawalna niÃ…Â¼ &#8220;Netscape&#8221; byÃ…â€ša kiedykolwiek&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Po rozwodzie Netscape.com z Web 2.0 (obecnie portal ten to AOL.com z innym logo, a zrzynka Digga przeniesiona zostaÃ…â€ša na Propeller.com) nastÃ„â€¦piÃ…â€šo jednoczesne wykastrowanie Netscape&#8217;a 9 z wszystkich spoÃ…â€šecznoÃ…â€ºciowych wihajstrÃƒÂ³w, skutkiem czego jedynÃ„â€¦ wartoÃ…â€ºciÃ„â€¦ dodanÃ„â€¦ NN9 wzglÃ„â„¢dem Firefoksa 2 byÃ…â€ša marka Netscape. Przy czym czy to jest &#8220;wartoÃ…â€ºÃ„â€¡ dodana&#8221;? Marka &#8220;Firefox&#8221; jest dziÃ…â€º bardziej rozpoznawalna niÃ…Â¼ &#8220;Netscape&#8221; byÃ…â€ša kiedykolwiek&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ml</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18136</link>
		<dc:creator>ml</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18136</guid>
		<description>There are still a lot of websites that require "IE or Netscape", linking to the download pages for each.  Since Firefox is the recommended upgrade path for Netscape users, I wonder if AOL will redirect the Netscape browser download pages to mozilla.com.  It would be interesting to have a page (www.mozilla.com/firefox/netscape?) welcoming legacy Netscape users and people going to the Netscape download page, advising them to download a supported version of Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are still a lot of websites that require &#8220;IE or Netscape&#8221;, linking to the download pages for each.  Since Firefox is the recommended upgrade path for Netscape users, I wonder if AOL will redirect the Netscape browser download pages to mozilla.com.  It would be interesting to have a page (www.mozilla.com/firefox/netscape?) welcoming legacy Netscape users and people going to the Netscape download page, advising them to download a supported version of Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Dolske</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18133</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18133</guid>
		<description>Hmm, well, I'm not so sure. Netscape seems different in that it made a huge splash in the mainstream, non-technical media. Just think of all the curmudgeonly financial types who got exposed to the name when they IPO'd.

Still, even if Netscape did have higher recognition in its heyday, I don't think it's worth much now. I suppose it might be interesting to have the Foundation take ownership of the name, though, if only to prevent another case of brand necrophilia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, well, I&#8217;m not so sure. Netscape seems different in that it made a huge splash in the mainstream, non-technical media. Just think of all the curmudgeonly financial types who got exposed to the name when they IPO&#8217;d.</p>
<p>Still, even if Netscape did have higher recognition in its heyday, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth much now. I suppose it might be interesting to have the Foundation take ownership of the name, though, if only to prevent another case of brand necrophilia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A nie mÃ³wiÅ‚em? &#171; marcoos.techblog</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18131</link>
		<dc:creator>A nie mÃ³wiÅ‚em? &#171; marcoos.techblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/2007/12/30/firefox-stronger-brand-than-netscape-ever-was/#comment-18131</guid>
		<description>[...] Po rozwodzie Netscape.com z Web 2.0 (obecnie portal ten to AOL.com z innym logo, a zrzynka Digga przeniesiona zostaÅ‚a na Propeller.com) nastÄ…piÅ‚o jednoczesne wykastrowanie Netscape&#8217;a 9 z wszystkich spoÅ‚ecznoÅ›ciowych wihajstrÃ³w, skutkiem czego jedynÄ… wartoÅ›ciÄ… dodanÄ… NN9 wzglÄ™dem Firefoksa 2 byÅ‚a marka Netscape. Przy czym czy to jest &#8220;wartoÅ›Ä‡ dodana&#8221;? Marka &#8220;Firefox&#8221; jest dziÅ› bardziej rozpoznawalna niÅ¼ &#8220;Netscape&#8221; byÅ‚a kiedykolwiek&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Po rozwodzie Netscape.com z Web 2.0 (obecnie portal ten to AOL.com z innym logo, a zrzynka Digga przeniesiona zostaÅ‚a na Propeller.com) nastÄ…piÅ‚o jednoczesne wykastrowanie Netscape&#8217;a 9 z wszystkich spoÅ‚ecznoÅ›ciowych wihajstrÃ³w, skutkiem czego jedynÄ… wartoÅ›ciÄ… dodanÄ… NN9 wzglÄ™dem Firefoksa 2 byÅ‚a marka Netscape. Przy czym czy to jest &#8220;wartoÅ›Ä‡ dodana&#8221;? Marka &#8220;Firefox&#8221; jest dziÅ› bardziej rozpoznawalna niÅ¼ &#8220;Netscape&#8221; byÅ‚a kiedykolwiek&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
