<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>djst&#039;s nest &#187; standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://djst.org/blog/tag/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://djst.org/blog</link>
	<description>David Tenser&#039;s brand new microblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:02:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft &#8211; Making it easier</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2009/06/25/microsoft-1984/</link>
		<comments>http://djst.org/blog/2009/06/25/microsoft-1984/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Tenser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1984]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixoutlook.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember back in 1984, when people were using Word to compose their e-mail messages that were sent around to colleagues and friends? We&#8217;ll chances are people will keep doing that in 2014 as well.
We’ve made the decision to continue to use Word for creating e-mail  messages because we believe it’s the best e-mail authoring [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.coverbrowser.com/image/time/3194-1.jpg"><img class="alignright" src="http://www.coverbrowser.com/image/time/3194-1.jpg" alt="Microsoft in 1984" width="252" height="332" /></a>Remember back in 1984, when people were using Word to compose their e-mail messages that were sent around to colleagues and friends? We&#8217;ll chances are people will keep doing that in 2014 as well.</p>
<blockquote><p>We’ve made the decision to continue to use Word for creating e-mail  messages because we believe it’s the best e-mail authoring experience  around, with rich tools that our Word customers have enjoyed for over 25  years. Our customers enjoy using a familiar and powerful tool for  creating e-mail, just as they do for creating documents.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/outlook/archive/2009/06/24/the-power-of-word-in-outlook.aspx">The Power of Word in Outlook</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">How do you want your e-mail experience to look like in the next five years? If you think Microsoft is on the right track, take no action. If you think they should switch to modern standards, send a tweet asking Microsoft  to improve standards support and make sure you include <a href="http://fixoutlook.org"><strong class="highlight">fixoutlook.org</strong></a> in your tweet.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Or just switch to a <a href="http://getthunderbird.com">better e-mail program</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://djst.org/blog/2009/06/25/microsoft-1984/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3.5 &#8212; Upgrading the web once again</title>
		<link>http://djst.org/blog/2009/06/11/firefox-35-upgrading-the-web-once-again/</link>
		<comments>http://djst.org/blog/2009/06/11/firefox-35-upgrading-the-web-once-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Tenser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sumo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://djst.org/blog/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t already, be sure to visit the coolest sub-domain of mozilla.org so far: hacks.mozilla.org.
The site was created to demonstrate what will be possible to do in Firefox 3.5 using open technologies. That is, technologies that are part of web standards like JavaScript and HTML &#8212; not proprietary plugins owned by single companies like, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/content-aware-image-resizing.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-395" title="content-aware-image-resizing" src="/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/content-aware-image-resizing-119x300.png" alt="" width="119" height="300" /></a>If you haven&#8217;t already, be sure to visit the coolest sub-domain of mozilla.org so far: <a href="http://hacks.mozilla.org">hacks.mozilla.org</a>.</p>
<p>The site was created to demonstrate what will be possible to do in Firefox 3.5 using open technologies. That is, technologies that are part of web standards like JavaScript and HTML &#8212; not proprietary plugins owned by single companies like, say, Flash.</p>
<p>As many people know, Flash is by far the most popular plugin on the web today, where the most obvious example of a website using it is YouTube. Replacing Flash as the technology for playing videos on YouTube with modern, open web standards would actually be very straightforward. The only catch is that there are too many people using old browsers that are not supporting these web standards yet, like Internet Explorer.</p>
<p>One way of solving this would be if everyone switched to Firefox 3.5 as soon as it&#8217;s released a few weeks from now. Or, web sites could be designed so that both Flash <em>and</em> Open Video formats are supported during this transition period when people are upgrading their browsers. Incidentally, that&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/sumo/2009/05/11/screencasts-are-coming/">exactly what SUMO will do</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m really impressed with what&#8217;s possible to do on the web today using just standards. My hope is that web developers will start to utilize these new, powerful, and fully open technologies to accelerate the advancement of the web even further.</p>
<p>My favorite technology demo so far is <a href="http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/06/content-aware-image-resizing/">Content Aware Image Resizing</a>. It just blows me away that a thing like that is possible with just JavaScript!</p>
<p>Be sure to upgrade your browser when Firefox 3.5 is released. Not just because it will be the fastest Firefox yet, but because it will make the whole web better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://djst.org/blog/2009/06/11/firefox-35-upgrading-the-web-once-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

